FAQs On Rectification of Mistake under Section 154

Rectification under Section 154 of the Income-tax Act — Detailed FAQs & Practical Guide

Section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 empowers the Income Tax Department to rectify mistakes apparent from the record in any order passed under the Act. Such mistakes are typically arithmetical, clerical, or factual errors that are evident without requiring detailed investigation or interpretation of law. Rectification under section 154 provides a simple and quick corrective mechanism to address obvious errors arising during processing, assessment, or appellate proceedings.

In practice, section 154 is most frequently invoked to correct errors in intimation under section 143(1), such as non-grant of TDS credit, incorrect interest calculation, or arithmetical mismatches. This FAQ page explains the scope, conditions, time limits, procedure, and limitations of rectification under section 154, based on the Income-tax Act and prevailing departmental practice.

Rectification of mistake under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act explained through FAQs
Explore Our Income Tax FAQs Hub.

FAQs-Rectification of Mistake under Section 154

Rectification under section 154 refers to correction of a mistake apparent from the record in any order passed by the Income Tax Department. Such mistakes must be obvious, patent, and not debatable in nature. The provision allows correction of errors without resorting to appeal proceedings.

Only mistakes that are apparent from the record can be rectified. These typically include arithmetical errors, clerical mistakes, incorrect carry-forward of figures, non-grant of TDS or advance tax credit, incorrect interest calculation, or mismatch of tax payments already reflected in the system.

Issues involving interpretation of law, debatable claims, or re-appreciation of facts cannot be rectified under section 154. Matters such as disallowance of deductions based on interpretation, classification disputes, or factual verification requiring evidence must be addressed through appeal or other remedies.

Rectification proceedings can be initiated either by the Income Tax Department on its own motion or by the taxpayer by filing an application for rectification through the Income Tax e-filing portal.

Rectification under section 154 can be carried out in respect of any order passed under the Income-tax Act, including intimation under section 143(1), assessment orders, rectification orders, and appellate orders, subject to conditions prescribed under the Act.

Rectification must be made within four years from the end of the financial year in which the order sought to be rectified was passed. Any rectification beyond this period is not permitted under the Act.

A rectification application can be filed electronically by logging into the Income Tax e-filing portal, selecting the relevant assessment year, choosing the appropriate rectification request type, and submitting details of the mistake along with supporting information, if required.

Yes. If rectification results in enhancement of assessment or reduction of refund, the taxpayer must be given an opportunity of being heard before passing the rectification order, as mandated by the Act.

No. Rectification under section 154 is a limited remedy available only for apparent mistakes, whereas an appeal is a substantive remedy against an order involving disputed issues or interpretation of law.

A revised return under section 139(5) is filed voluntarily by the taxpayer to correct omissions or wrong statements in the return, whereas rectification under section 154 is used to correct mistakes in an order already passed by the Income Tax Department.

Yes. Non-grant or short grant of TDS credit reflected in Form 26AS or AIS is one of the most common grounds for filing rectification under section 154.

The Act does not prescribe a specific time limit for disposal of a rectification application. However, such applications are generally processed electronically by CPC and disposed of within a reasonable period, subject to system workload.

Yes. If the issue raised is not a mistake apparent from the record or requires detailed examination, the rectification application may be rejected. Such rejection does not bar the taxpayer from pursuing other remedies available under the Act.

If rectification is rejected or does not provide relief, the taxpayer may consider filing an appeal, seeking revision, or pursuing other remedies depending on the nature of the issue and statutory timelines.

Key Takeaway

Section 154 provides a quick and efficient corrective mechanism to address obvious mistakes in income-tax orders without engaging in prolonged appellate proceedings. Its scope, however, is deliberately narrow and confined to mistakes apparent from the record. Attempting to use section 154 for debatable or interpretational issues often leads to rejection.

Timely identification of eligible mistakes—such as incorrect tax credit, interest miscalculation, or arithmetical errors—and prompt filing of rectification applications can prevent unnecessary tax demands, interest accumulation, and litigation. Understanding the limits of section 154 enables taxpayers to choose the correct remedial path and manage post-processing issues effectively.

FAQs on rectification under Section 154 for correcting income tax errors
FAQs explaining rectification of mistakes under Section 154 and the procedure for correction of income tax orders

Next steps

Key official sources

Disclaimer

This FAQ is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. Tax positions should be evaluated based on individual facts and applicable law.